TESTIMONIES OF FRENCH PILOTS

 

Three French pilots confronted, in flight, with UFO came to testify in front of the committee. Their testimonies are all the more interesting as belonging to the world of the aeronautics, they know how to appreciate better than the others the air phenomena.

 

PILOT OF MIRAGE IV (IN MARCH 7, 1977)

 

 The progress of this incident was reconstituted from the radio exchanges among the pilot and the controller which, according to the procedure current in all the mission controls, are systematically recorded and kept for a while.

The incident occurred on March 7, 1977 at about local 21 o'clock, in the fault of Dijon, while the Mirage IV is back, connected autopilot, towards Luxeuil after a night mission. At the height of 9 600 m, evolving at the speed of " Mach 0,9 ", the conditions of flight are very good. The pilot and his navigator observe at " 3 o'clock " (code schedule) of their plane a very brilliant light, at the same height, coming to cap collision towards them and getting very fast closer. The pilot interrogates the military radar tracking station of Contrexéville to ask if they have a radar contact on the plane coming towards them (he thinks that it is an interceptor of air defence who, as it is practised usually, tries to intercept their plane to identify it then by means of its lighthouse of identification). The radar controller, who has no corresponding radar contact on its scope, answers negatively and asks to the pilots to verify their oxygen. This demand on behalf of the controller is a procedure of classic help; it shows well that this one is so surprised by the question of the crew as he thinks of a boredom of oxygen susceptible to generate an hallucination. The light maintaining his cap towards the Mirage IV, the pilot begins a bend to the right that it is obliged to squeeze more and more (3 - 4 g) to try to keep the visual contact on " the aggressor " and to prevent it from taking place back sector. In spite of this operation, the light settles down behind the Mirage IV at a distance estimated of 1500 m; at this moment the pilot knocks down his bend to find a visual contact and he sees the light going away very quickly at " 11 o'clock "; he resumes the cap on Luxeuil. But 45 seconds later, feeling "observed ", according to his own terms, he says to the navigator: " you go to see, it is going to return ". And effectively, an identical light appears at " 3 o'clock ". The pilot opens then a very tight bend (6,5 g) to kick away his device of what he considers henceforth as a real threat. The light follows the evolution of the Mirage IV to take place back sector at a distance estimated of 2000 m; the pilot overturns, as first, and the light sees again disappearing in the same conditions. The controller always has no radar check. Here is for the facts. Two points deserve to be underlined :

- Only a combat aircraft would have been able to have a behavior comparable to that of both lights (speed, maneuvrability). In that case, the controller would have had a radar contact on this plane, especially at this height, contact that he would have all the better shown than there was no other traffic near the Mirage IV.

- Considering the visible evolutions of both lights, that they are the same machine or not, their speed could be only supersonic, what, in the case of combat aircraft, it would be translated on the ground by a very important sound clap because of the phenomenon of focalisation of the shock wave generated by the bend. It would have been all the more noticed around as it was dark. Now, no noise was perceived in the region.

 

C Hunting pilot (in March 3, 1976)

C Flight AF 3532 Air france (in January 28, 1994)

 

C Previous page

C Home Page

Please , visit our sponsor, at your risks and perils...!!!

.fr/images/3/banners/aucbanner110.gif" X-SAS-UseImageWidth X-SAS-UseImageHeight ALIGN=bottom>